• Log In | Sign Up

  • News
  • Reviews
  • Top Games
  • Search
  • New Releases
  • Daily Deals
  • Forums
Adventure Gamers Reader reviews, read what other adventure gamers think of Dracula 3: The Path of the Dragon.

Average Reader Rating for Dracula 3: The Path of the Dragon


Average based on 14 ratings

Your Rating:

add review

Latest reader reviews


Stars - 20

Rating by troninho posted on May 21, 2020 | edit | delete


Stars - 35

Rating by aseonov posted on Feb 23, 2015 | edit | delete


Stars - 50

Rating by CroGamer posted on Mar 8, 2014 | edit | delete


Stars - 40

Rating by olomaster posted on Mar 18, 2013 | edit | delete


Stars - 45

Rating by Cheshire Cat posted on Feb 1, 2013 | edit | delete


Stars - 40

Rating by manofours posted on Oct 7, 2012 | edit | delete


Stars - 50

Rating by Platin-Pathetic|arno moriani posted on Oct 6, 2012 | edit | delete


Stars - 30

Rating by Niclas posted on Aug 23, 2012 | edit | delete


Interesting Adventure with eery atmosphere


I really wanted to love this game. The atmosphere, graphics, and the characters are just great. However I have realised that I don’t have patience for overly complicated puzzles that requires hours of reading and comparing documents. Don’t get me wrong I like a solid puzzle here and there, but not ALL the time. I like to mix it up with classical inventory puzzles. The puzzles in this game requieres way to much reading, as I played the game I was kind of understanding what I should do, but i never had the patience to sit for hours to figure out the puzzles, I ended up looking in a walkthrough way to many times. If you like games that requiere a lot of reading and too many overly complicated puzzles, this game might just be for you. If you like traditional inventory puzzles, this is definitely not for you.


Read the review »

Time Played: Over 20 hours
Difficulty: Very Hard

Stars - 40

Rating by millenia posted on May 20, 2012 | edit | delete


Stars - 45

Rating by cygma posted on May 20, 2012 | edit | delete


Page 1 of 2    1 2 > 
Back to the top