Game interfaces

[Bastich]

Mod: this thread has been split off from the thread about Fahrenheit (http://forums.adventuregamers.com/showthread.php?t=2007)

The problem is that you immediately associate keyboard control with an uncomfortable interface.
That would be because it is the most uncomfortable interface to play a game with. It was never designed for games and is an ergonomically poor device compared to a controller or a mouse. In fact, it isn't even a good device for typing, to be honest. If a game is good only with the keyboard, it is in spite of its interface, not because of it.

While it is important to keep an open mind, being skeptical of keyboard only games is fully justified, especially considering there is little reason to do so nowadays other than pure laziness.

Who cares what kind of interface it is, as long as it's well-designed!
If it is made for keyboard only, it is already poorly designed from the start.

[TheDerman]

Some people prefer keyboard controls, myself included - just because some people don't, doesn't mean a game is "poorly designed from the start" - if I'm making a game, and my favourite controls are the keyboard, am I wrong to make said game, keyboard controlled? Why? Just because some people don't like it?

There is a definite air of "don't change our beloved genre's style" about it all I feel - if some adventure types have their way, we'll still be playing flat 2D games with the mouse when the rest of the world are playing games inside a Matrix-esque Super Gaming Arena (TM) - I digress.

My point - keyboard RULEZZZZZ!!! WOOHOO!!! WOOOO!!!

[fireside]

If it is made for keyboard only, it is already poorly designed from the start.

There's a big difference between mouse control and keyboard. With a mouse your just telling the character where it supposed to end up, and that desination has to be transcribed from the 2d mouse coordinates to the 3d world coordinates, with keyboard your steering the avatar to the destination. The mouse has to have a character that knows where objects are and can steer around them. The keyboard only needs simple collision detection. Usually that kind of thing is built into engines, though, because the npc's need it. I think what's keeping games from writing in mouse control is consoles. Probably won't see it in any game that's multi-platform anymore.

edit: I forgot about the mouse steer where you move the mouse up and down and right and left. That is easy to add to a game.

[tabacco]

If it is made for keyboard only, it is already poorly designed from the start.

That is such an incredibly poor assumption, it just amazes me. It's clear that you don't like keyboard control in games, which is fine. But to say that any game with a control system you personally don't like is poorly designed, that's just dumb.

[fireside]

That is such an incredibly poor assumption, it just amazes me. It's clear that you don't like keyboard control in games, which is fine. But to say that any game with a control system you personally don't like is poorly designed, that's just dumb.

The bad part is that the interface is such a small and unimportant part of the game, and it's the mechanical end, not the inspirational end. This game looks really intriquing, I don't know how anyone could right it off because the interface isn't to their liking.

[TheDerman]

I think the interface is an important feature - a bad interface that is actually poorly designed and difficult to understand and use, can detract from the actual gameplay value.

But, keyboard control doesn't automatically result in a poor interface, and therefore, a poor game - it's all about the game as a whole.

[tabacco]

Exactly! to quote Marek from awhile ago (on a debate about 3d vs. 2d):

It's like saying "all houses built with hammers have windows that are too small and have ugly retro kitchens! hammers are bad!

[Bastich]

Aaahhh.. Just feel the love...

I find it humorous that I was just recently accused of stifling the opinions of others, yet every time I state my opinion, I am instantly harangued by multiple people. Who is trying to oppress whom? :rolleyes: LOL!

My comment wasn't about AGs or the quality of game content, but of comfort. I suggest some of you actually take a class on ergonomics, rather than assume that because you like something a certain way, it is the best. It isn't an opinion that a keyboard has poor ergonomics. It is a scientific fact. I am sure the countless people who get repetiitive stress injuries every year, would like to hear your opinions on how great the keyboard is as an input device. A mouse is a bit better, yet there is still a an RSI that is called, guess what? Mouse Elbow. People who spend an inordinate amount of time using a mouse can get tendonitis of the forearm extensors. The game-pad is actually the best. Go figure, the interface device that was actually designed for games is the most comfortable and least prone to debilitating injury.

As for me not liking keyboard based games, you are 100% wrong. I have never once let a keyboard-based game deter me. What the hell do you think I used to play games with on the PC before the mouse was commercialized?

It is funny to see the other side of the coin for a change. I am usually the one accused of holding up progress in AGs, etc., yet when it comes to input devices, I am the revolutionary. I am a stickler for interface and ergonomic design, not because a keyboard is some sort of barrier to my entertainment, but because I think interfaces should be transparent and be accessible to everyone, and not potentially lead to injury. This is the aspect of design I would like to see advanced on the hardware side.

For once, it is you people who are the Luddites, not I. I want a more ergonomic successor to the mouse and gamepad, not to stay trapped in the stone age with a keyboard. The eventual goal is to not need physical input devices at all...

[TheDerman]

I am no luddite - that's libel fella - or at least, a nasty thing to say. :pan: take that !

I was merely disagreeing with the sweeping generalisation that a keyboard game is poorly designed from the start, just because it has the keyboard as its control device - I feel this is simply not true - by that token, I could say mouse games are poorly designed from the start, because they use the mouse, which is not MY favourite method - but then, that wouldn't be true either.

And ergonomics or no urgenomiks, I don't want to use a gamepad on my PC, not now, not ever, no way, no how - I get frustrated enough with them on the consoles.

The best control method is the keyboard/mouse combo, as seen in FPS's, and some adventures - only with the actual power of thought manipulating things on screen, can this method lose the throne.

And finally - if you do anything for long enough, it won't be good for you - anybody suffering RSI from playing computersgames, maybe has more problems than just a dislike of keyboards.

Everyone can have their opinion, but saying what you said is not merely an opinion - it's a false accusation.

[colpet]

I am dubious about games that involve keyboard control for the following reasons:
- I have trouble using the arrow keys to move (either in 1st or 3rd person). When I tried to play Grim Fandango poor Manny must have had numerous concussions from walking into the wall.:)
- Many keyboard control games incorporate action elements (i.e. jumping or pushing). Of course this remains to be seen in newer games, so I'll wait for some reviews to get info on this . BTW, I don't like action/adventure mixes. I prefer to use my brain for puzzles, not the dexterity of my fingers.
- Many keyboard control games are in 3rd person perspective. I prefer 1st.
- I like to play games leaning up close to my monitor and resting my left arm on the desk. My keyboard is in a drawer under the desk, so it's a chore to move it out. It breaks up the concentration of the gameplay.
- I love the fluidity of mouse controlled movement in 3D games.


So far, no keyboard controls I've tried have been better than using the mouse for me. But the point is I have tried keyboard games when I've been intrigued by descriptions of the game (so I'm not that restrictive). I'm playing Uru right now using mostly 1st person mouse movement, but I still need to use the space bar to jump (and there is a lot of that in this game :sad: ). I'm enjoying the rest of game enough to continue playing.

[Marek]

Let's all try to not turn this into "Adventure conversations: Reloaded" ...

[remixor]

I find it humorous that I was just recently accused of stifling the opinions of others, yet every time I state my opinion, I am instantly harangued by multiple people. Who is trying to oppress whom? :rolleyes: LOL!

LOL!!!!! indeed. Probably in this case it's because you make statements so broad as to say that the keyboard is by nature an inferior device for anything at all, including playing games and typing. Well, sorry man, but it's what we have. I don't know what you suggest for typing, but you'd better get on the ball and register a patent.

My comment wasn't about AGs or the quality of game content, but of comfort. I suggest some of you actually take a class on ergonomics, rather than assume that because you like something a certain way, it is the best. It isn't an opinion that a keyboard has poor ergonomics. It is a scientific fact. I am sure the countless people who get repetiitive stress injuries every year, would like to hear your opinions on how great the keyboard is as an input device. A mouse is a bit better, yet there is still a an RSI that is called, guess what? Mouse Elbow. People who spend an inordinate amount of time using a mouse can get tendonitis of the forearm extensors. The game-pad is actually the best. Go figure, the interface device that was actually designed for games is the most comfortable and least prone to debilitating injury.
Go ahead and just try to scare us. I know for a fact that you use a keyboard on a regular basis! How do I know? Magic!


As for me not liking keyboard based games, you are 100% wrong. I have never once let a keyboard-based game deter me. What the hell do you think I used to play games with on the PC before the mouse was commercialized?

I don't know, but I'm guessing it gives you some kind of ergonomic disorder or something?

It is funny to see the other side of the coin for a change. I am usually the one accused of holding up progress in AGs, etc., yet when it comes to input devices, I am the revolutionary. I am a stickler for interface and ergonomic design, not because a keyboard is some sort of barrier to my entertainment, but because I think interfaces should be transparent and be accessible to everyone, and not potentially lead to injury. This is the aspect of design I would like to see advanced on the hardware side.

For once, it is you people who are the Luddites, not I. I want a more ergonomic successor to the mouse and gamepad, not to stay trapped in the stone age with a keyboard. The eventual goal is to not need physical input devices at all...

Look, nobody in this thread has been shouting the praises of the keyboard, ok? Once again you masterfully take people's posts and twist them into some completely extreme version of what they said. People have not been claiming the keyboard is ideal, they've been saying that to be prejudiced against a game just because it uses keyboard controls is silly. I don't know how you turned that into some ludicrous hardline Luddite perspective denouncing progress in input devices.

[Jake]

I'd be interested to see someone try a character-centric keyboard controlled 3rd person game with fixed (or moving, but still changing) camera angles ala Grim Fandango, but instead of being keyboard only it also integrated a mouselook-like feature (and maybe even an on-mouse walk button for people with three button mice)... it seems like in theory that could be doable and not be horrible. It would be so nice to play something like BS3 or Grim with a mouse but still get the benefits of a 3D environment, and an analog gamepad's ability to control the speed of your turns.

Anyway that aside, how about that Fahrenheit game?

[Kingzjester]

Hey Bastich, I agree. We need to devise a new keyboard.

[fireside]

I think the interface is an important feature - a bad interface that is actually poorly designed and difficult to understand and use, can detract from the actual gameplay value.
But, keyboard control doesn't automatically result in a poor interface, and therefore, a poor game - it's all about the game as a whole.

I can adjust to almost any interface. What I can't adjust to is a boring, uninspired story, no brain hide and seek puzzles, and role playing games.

[Ninja Dodo]

If it is made for keyboard only, it is already poorly designed from the start.That is one of the most unimaginative statements I ever heard.

Nobody is saying that the keyboard is perfect or that it should replace other input devices. What I'm saying is that designers should consider what they have, and try and come up with creative and more entertaining ways of playing using those things. I'm all for designing the ultra-ergonomic and playable input device, but until that happens, we're stuck with the current hardware. Ignoring any single one of those out of principle would be a shame.

One interface that was all keyboard which I particularly liked was Little Big Adventure... one that was perfected in the sequel into a highly playable and smooth way of input. Often though, combinations can offer good alternatives. Outcast had a very elegant mouse + keyboard combo.

There's nothing inherently wrong with keyboards or mouses, as long as they're put to creative and well-thought out use.

If you're getting RSI from playing games, maybe you should just take a break a bit more often.

[Bastich]

I have been going to forums since they were invented, and in all those years I have NEVER been on a forum with people as argumentative as this one. I don't get in arguments anywhere else. Do you want to know why that is? It is because the other forums are occupied by adults who actually want to discuss things, not a bunch of people who view any outsider that doesn't conform to their views by continuously posting "me too" responses that fit in with their little clique as some sort of monster. Nope, anyone who doesn't agree with the status quo is some sort of infidel defiler, some intolerable blasphemer who should instantly be attacked by exploiting any available ambiguities in their dialogue.

This topic is the perfect example. Someone posted that they didn't like keyboard-only controlled games and everyone jumped all over her like she was some crazy freak deserving of institutionalization, de-programming, training and eventual brainwashing to conform to your standards. This happens every time someone says keyboard controls aren't good. Fairygodmother was the last victim.

There is, of course, no possibility that maybe the keyboard is less than an optimal interface design decision. It is always the player's fault. Developer errors are something to adapt to, not something to expect improvement on. God forbid that! Even FPSes have progressed almost completely off the keyboard since their inception for precision and ergonomic reasons. Why do you people support holding back such progression in other genres? A keyboard-only game is just ignorant at this point. Everything else has moved away from that as much as possible because it sucks. It shows disctinct lack of vision to not move beyond the keyboard at this point.

Getting back to my point, I posted in support that keyboards are ergonomically poor devices, and hence centering an entire game around it, when there are other better possibilities is a poor decision and the attack is on me. You see, on any other forum I visit, if people are unsure of what I am getting at, they probe me for more information. They are also actually interested in hearing opinions other than their own. Here is how this may have progressed in another forum:

Dialogue on forum X:

Bastich: ...ergonomically poor device... ...If it is made for keyboard only, it is already poorly designed from the start...

Respondent A: What aspects of the keyboard are you referring to in specific that are a problem, and how would you change the interface to improve them? Do you mean just using a mouse, a combination of mouse and keyboard, a gamepad, or even something completely different? Could you elaborate? How exactly would the player interact with the game using such methods? Thanks!

Compare that to what happens in this forum. You can see the difference, can't you? Here, every assumption imaginable is forced onto my statements, rather than further inquiries made upon them. Is it any surprise that there aren't a lot of older people who post frequently here, considering the treatment you give them.

You see, if some of you actually grew up and didn't see every differing opinion out there as a direct assault on your entire system of beliefs, actual discussions could take place instead of arguments. If I would have gotten the above response, we would be having a rational discussion on input devices. Instead, a bunch of childish people have turned this into a flame war by placing whatever meaning they want to on my statements for the express purpose of arguing. There is no desire for discussion at all. There is nothing inherently inflammatory about my statements. Only in your insecure interpretation of them. Grow up!

[Kingzjester]

This topic is the perfect example. Someone posted that they didn't like keyboard-only controlled games and everyone jumped all over her like she was some crazy freak deserving of institutionalization, de-programming, training and eventual brainwashing to conform to your standards. This happens every time someone says keyboard controls aren't good. Fairygodmother was the last victim.It wasn't everybody who jumped her, it was just me. I was feeling wild that day, I don't even remember why. Being of the sort that likes to be precise in his language I was picked by the exaggerated language she used to describe Manny's alleged uncontrolable spins, the generally useless interface of the game, and the like. Had I been more careful and had I opened a thesaurus to find a proper euphemism for the ever so cras 'notorious lie' (I was actually searching my mind for a while before I opted for a faux pas) Jim wouldn't have jumped me for calling a lady a liar. For the remainder of the virulent part of the thread I was being chastised for not apologizing instantaneously....

The interface in Grim Fandango was no problem for me, and I don't see how gamepads are much of an improvement over anything that the keyboard does... except perhaps on the ergonomic front.

[remixor]

Bastich: On those other forums, do you take perfectly reasonable statements like "Denouncing a game just because it has keyboard controls is unfair" and turn them into "Keyboards are wonderful brilliant god-like devices and anyone who doesn't like them is evil"? Because that's what you're doing now.

[Stinger]

This is all just ludicrous in a thread that is supposed to be about one of the most promising adventure games of the coming years. So everyone just forget your little tiffs, stop causing problems, stop creating problems where none exist, and talk about Fahrenheit (which shouldn't be too hard after reading Marek's preview), or we're going to close this thread. It's time for everyone on this board to stop looking for fights, and the ludicrous downswing in conversational pacifism recently is forcing the moderators to become more involved. Thank you.

[Bastich]

On those other forums, do you take perfectly reasonable statements like "Denouncing a game just because it has keyboard controls is unfair" and turn them into "Keyboards are wonderful brilliant god-like devices and anyone who doesn't like them is evil"? Because that's what you're doing now.

This is EXACTLY the point I was just making remixor. You are already guilty of it. Go back and read my original post. The only thing I said is that keyboards are ergonomically poor input devices and designing a game entirely around them is a poor design choice. What the hell does that have anything to do with whether anyone likes it or not? I didn't give any opinion either way other than as far as ergonomics., which is a scientific view of interface based on kinesiology, biomechanics, and proper engineering. YOU inferred all the rest as well as the others. Suddenly, I was somehow arguing for P&C over keyboard, when I never mentioned such a thing, I was making false accusations, I didn't like keyboard controls, that I was somehow saying the game itself was bad purely because of said interface, and more. I never implied any of those things. YOU and others made them up out of a desire to argue. Rather than make crap up, ask me what the hell I meant if you don't understand it. Everyone is guilty of it to some degree, but it is getting ridiculous lately. Everything exploded over interpretations of what I said, NOT the actual words I said.

[fireside]

I have been going to forums since they were invented, and in all those years I have NEVER been on a forum with people as argumentative as this one.

Arguments are actually good as long as there aren't any personal attacks. We grow by listening to people who disagree with us, and we think more about what our own position is and why we take it.

[eriq]

I have been going to forums since they were invented, and in all those years I have NEVER been on a forum with people as argumentative as this one.

.....There is no desire for discussion at all. There is nothing inherently inflammatory about my statements. Only in your insecure interpretation of them. Grow up! and with some really rude people I might add!

I recently posted what I thought a certain adventure game might be about and was completely flamed by a certain someone. The adventure gamers boards are somewhere I go because I feel like I can be myself and talk and go on about whatever adventure game type stuff I want to and it's really too bad that some people on here have corn cobs stuck up their asses where they feel like they have to make other people feel bad for saying what's on their mind... even if it IS about something as silly as a game that MIGHT or might NOT be coming out.

I expect to be able to say whatever the hell I want to about whatever game I want to whenever I want because this is a board about adventure games and the people who love and support them. The community is small enough! If you don't have anything nice to say, then shut up!


edit... FARENHEIT looks amazing. Quantic Dream cancelled their previous effort which I was really looking forward to. This one looks promising. The whole idea of "chapters" and episodes is intriguing. And the graphics have that "Quantic" feel!

[Kingzjester]

I recently posted what I thought a certain adventure game might be about and was completely flamed by a certain someone.You have to remember and keep in mind that that certain someone has no sense of humor or irony whatsoever.

[bigjko]

Now that this thread's been pulled off the Fahrenheit thread, this is your chance to go aggressive guys. Vent out. Express your frustrations!

#25!!

[Jake]

Though I'm sure people who have been around here far longer than me will disagree, as of three or four months ago I found this place to be probably the best forum on the Net. It was full of people who didn't crap on you whenever you disagreed, but would instead write a lengthy response discussing it. That is not the case anymore. In fact, it's become 100% the opposite. As remixor pointed out to me via a PM I just noticed in the middle of typing this post, these forums in fact no longer serve as a home to discuss ideas and life and just sort of have fun with it all, but instead now just make me angry! Any discussion of any merit is guaranteed to get derailed by the second page due to someone seemingly going out of their way to take a remark personally, and then 5 pages of stubborn angry replies fly by. I know I wasn't here for the "real" "old AG forum," but I definitely miss the "recent" "old AG forum," and I don't really know what to do about it.

there you go, bigjko :)

[Swordmaster]

Nope, anyone who doesn't agree with the status quo is some sort of infidel defiler, some intolerable blasphemer who should instantly be attacked by exploiting any available ambiguities in their dialogue. Funny, in the Adventure Conversations thread some infidel defilers didn't "agree with the status quo" of certain companies (*cough*TAC*cough*) releasing the same Myst clones over and over again which resulted into an instant attack exploiting the ambiguity of mentioning mature women in the posts - by some freak accident, the general dissatisfaction with the mass-produced 3D adventures turned into age racism. The tables have turned, eh? :rolleyes:

Why do you people support holding back such progression in other genres? A keyboard-only game is just ignorant at this point. Everything else has moved away from that as much as possible because it sucks. It shows disctinct lack of vision to not move beyond the keyboard at this point. Replace the word "keyboard" with the word "linearity" in the above quotation, please. Then think for a while what we discussed about in the Adventure Conversations thread.

*sigh*

[bigjko]

there you go, bigjko :)

Thank you. :D

Now, off to enjoy some unboiled pasta. Delicious!

[eriq]

You have to remember and keep in mind that that certain someone has no sense of humor or irony whatsoever. ;)

well we can pull the corn cob out together.


edit:

On the subject of game interfaces, one of my favourites was from the old Full Throttle and Curse of Monkey Island games. I like the whole context sensitive pop-up interface. I'm sure it's much more difficult to program but it's definetely my favourite.

Any interface works for me as long as it's implemented well... keyboard OR mouse (though I like using the mouse to click on things and walk around. It just feels right.) Since i'm more of a visual person, I tend to like interfaces that are all dressed up graphically like the Full Throttle "icon pad". I love inventory graphics too. I like seeing all the items i've got in my pocket.

Loom also had an amazing interface, of course.

Recently, I thought Broken Sword 3 had a pretty fun interface with all the lovely icons and character heads. I also thought the keyboard implementation was pretty unique. I didn't care for the crates as much as I did the puzzles (bring 'em on!) but the interface was very clean. I would have prefered it to have been mouse-driven like the originals.

[Bastich]

It was full of people who didn't crap on you whenever you disagreed, but would instead write a lengthy response discussing it. That is not the case anymore. In fact, it's become 100% the opposite.

Yeah, right. When I first came to this forum, I was submitting reader reviews and contributing and not getting into arguments, and then there was a topic that was an opinion thread. For the very first time, I bothered to express an opinion, before anyone even knew what I liked in AGs at all, and did a certain someone try to understand my point and query it to find out what I meant? Nope. I will quote that person for you Jake:

"Your sheer powers of rationalization have actually blinded me straight out of this thread. Farewell forever, friend."

I think you may know this person who went out of their way to insult me without provocation for expressing my opinion. An opinion BTW, that I stated was just a trivial complaint. You know what? I think it is the same person who Eriq is talking about...

I had also mentioned that I liked the fact that AGs had a relaxed play-style. While I wasn't quoted, this response came soon after:

"HaHaHaHaHaHa!! Again: This is NOT your grandmother's adventure game!!"

Yep. So open to other's opinions here. Apparently, I am an irrational old lady for expressing them. I was made to feel so welcome...

[Bastich]

Funny, in the Adventure Conversations thread some infidel defilers didn't "agree with the status quo" of certain companies (*cough*TAC*cough*) releasing the same Myst clones over and over again which resulted into an instant attack exploiting the ambiguity of mentioning mature women in the posts - by some freak accident, the general dissatisfaction with the mass-produced 3D adventures turned into age racism. The tables have turned, eh? :rolleyes:

Go back to the source of the problem. Talking about what happened AFTER everyone was already pissed off isn't helpful. I stated a general opinion about dialogue choices and both you and remixor made no attempt to to discuss, you attacked me and told me to go to other genres. Mag, OTOH, responded intelligently, which I appreciated. THAT was the beginning of that thread getting out of hand. Things really escalated when you quoted me out of context, and then everyone's tempers flared and it got useless after that. If the conversation would have stuck to just Mag and I, it probably wouldn't have escalated.

[fireside]

From reading this thread, I get the impression that people are saying anyone that disagrees with them is terribly rude and flames them. We can't say that linearity or mouse control is good because then we are just completely obnoxious. We can't take anything you say literally, we're supposed to know exactly what you were thinking. No problem. :rolleyes:

[fireside]

You have to remember and keep in mind that that certain someone has no sense of humor or irony whatsoever.

Here's an example of a rude personal attack from someone who is complaining about rude personal attacks.

[remixor]

Defense

This will be my last word on the matter. You (that is, Bastich) claimed that we (that is, many others in this thread) believe the keyboard to be the pinnacle of gaming control, and that we are Luddites who resist ergonomic advancement. However, this is not what we meant, nor what we said. As much as you claim that we misinterpret your posts, it looks like you have deliberately done the same thing. Maybe it was just borne out of frustration, I don't know, and at this point it doesn't even matter anymore. I'm done with this ridiculous issue.

[remixor]

Here's an example of a rude personal attack from someone who is complaining about rude personal attacks.

Actually, and I could be wrong, I believe that Kingz was being self-deprecating.

[Kingzjester]

Here's an example of a rude personal attack from someone who is complaining about rude personal attacks.No, it is a statement of fact. If someone said that I am a shitty basketball player, I would not be offended because it is true. I could be offended by somehting like that is if I were trying to pose as someone who is a star athlete, which I am not.

[remixor]

"Your sheer powers of rationalization have actually blinded me straight out of this thread. Farewell forever, friend."

I think you may know this person who went out of their way to insult me without provocation for expressing my opinion. An opinion BTW, that I stated was just a trivial complaint. You know what? I think it is the same person who Eriq is talking about...

I'm in a library and will be leaving in a few minutes, so I have no desire to drag up that thread and look up the specifics, but if I recall correctly, that post was made after Jake had tried time and time again to communicate his point to you. When it became obvious it just wasn't going to work out, he bowed out of the discussion. It was a bit of a jab, yes, but it was obviously intended to be humorous more than anything else, and you should be able to take digs like that without blowing up.

[fireside]

No, it is a statement of fact. If someone said that I am a shitty basketball player, I would not be offended because it is true. I could be offended by somehting like that is if I were trying to pose as someone who is a star athlete, which I am not.

You have to remember and keep in mind that that certain someone has no sense of humor or irony whatsoever.

That statement is opinion. It can never be fact.

[Terabin]

Arguments are actually good as long as there aren't any personal attacks. We grow by listening to people who disagree with us, and we think more about what our own position is and why we take it.

A few words of wisdom from Fugazi:

The Argument

When they start falling
Executions will commence
Sides will not matter now
Matter makes no sense
How did a difference
Become a disease
I'm sure you have reasons
A rational defence
Weapons and motives
Bloody fingerprints
But I can't help thinking
It's still all disease

Here comes the argument
Here comes the argument
Here comes the argument
Folderol

It's all about strikes now
So here's what's striking me
That some punk could argue
Some moral A.B.C.'s
When people are catching
What bombers release
I'm on a mission
To never agree

Here comes the argument
Here comes the argument
Here comes the argument
Here comes the argument
Here it comes

[remixor]

Fugazi is great

[fireside]

A few words of wisdom from Fugazi:

Interesting poem. What do you think he was trying to say?

[Terabin]

Interesting poem. What do you think he was trying to say?

Although I'm not sure as to what the intention of the song's lyrics directly are, I thought it addresses the idea of how when people disagree, often the status quo jumps all over them. For example, bastich disagreed with what everyone else said, even if it was pretty aggressively one-sided, and people flamed him. But at the same time, I think the song could comment on how if people argue in the forum, I don't think it necessarily means that the world is coming to an end. People have their opinions and oftentimes, they are going to say them. Why do we have to always go out of our way to be extremely passive about everything? Disagree! It's fun! Except, don't take it too seriously. Draw the line, move on, and try to be productive about talking about AGs.

[Terabin]

Bitching about who flamed who isn't going to help the situation any. It's going to make people more defensive. So get over it and talk game interfaces. Personally, I like the mouse and point and click, but I didn't mind the Grim Fandango keyboard route either. Eventually, I'm sure I'll be arthritic and my fingers won't work and I'll become paralyzed from the downsides of clicking and pressing keyboard buttons, but until that point, give me good stories and good puzzles!

[fireside]

People have their opinions and oftentimes, they are going to say them. Why do we have to always go out of our way to be extremely passive about everything? Disagree! It's fun! Except, don't take it too seriously. Draw the line, move on, and try to be productive about talking about AGs.

I agree 100%, can't even "argue".

[Kingzjester]

You have to remember and keep in mind that that certain someone has no sense of humor or irony whatsoever.

That statement is opinion. It can never be fact.Ok, you're right. Please allow me to paraphrase: it is not a fact, it is a natural law. Basing my conclusion on a careful analysis of extensive, far-reaching data (there was also an ample control group) I created a postulate. The postulate has been tested repeatedly by not simply me but many other people who have confirmed my finding. Since it is nigh infallible (as infallible as, say, the laws of electron motion in a magnetic field), that statement is nothing less than a natural law. Blow me.

[tabacco]

Alright, that's it. This thread isn't going anywhere useful, and it's getting out of control.