Puzzle Agent 2 review
The Good: Unique cartoon art style; eerie audio provides a tense and compelling atmosphere; solid voice acting.
The Bad: Confusing, poorly developed story; lack of challenge and too much puzzle repetition; unable to speed up slow, dull dialogue; heavy asset reuse from the original.
Our Verdict: Puzzle Agent 2 takes a disappointing step backward, failing to resolve key criticisms from the first instalment whilst introducing new problems of its own.

The original Puzzle Agent was Telltale’s response to the growing popularity of Professor Layton-style gameplay. The game was enjoyable largely thanks to its surreal storyline, dark comic atmosphere, and often challenging brainteasers, but was held back by a reliance on puzzle repetition and poor integration of its gameplay into the plot. Unfortunately, both problems are still equally evident in Puzzle Agent 2, if not more so, and the puzzles are noticeably weaker and dreadfully easy this time. Even the first game’s strengths have suffered, as the once-promising plot spins its wheels here, covering all the same territory before spinning out of control in a nonsensical direction. The end result is a sequel that feels like two steps back without even one step forward.

You once again play as Nelson Tethers, FBI agent of the Department of Puzzle Research, and even though you’re on vacation and your last case has been closed, there are still questions that need answering. Returning to the bizarre, snowy town of Scoggins, Minnesota, you’ll soon find yourself back in familiar territory, arriving outside the inn looking for a place to stay. For returning players, familiarity is commonplace throughout, as you visit many of the same scenes and converse with the same locals a second time around. Those starting with the sequel will be left a little confused, as the story is a pretty direct continuation of the first but very little in-game effort has been made to explain past events. Most of what you need to know is tucked away in Nelson’s journal, giving you a more detailed recap.

The new instalment focuses on the disappearance of eraser factory foreman Isaac Davner, discovering the truth behind the pesky forest gnomes known as the ‘Hidden People’ (who could perhaps just be a figment of Nelson’s imagination) and finding out why the village’s Brotherhood cult is being so secretive. In other words, pretty much a repeat of its predecessor. Whilst there are new plot additions eventually, from haunting visions of astronauts in the woods to government cover-ups by a swarm of black-suited, sunglass-wearing feds, the basic premise remains the same, and you’ll spend more than half the game asking the same questions (and getting nowhere) as you did the first time. I’d love to say the story improves when the new elements take over, but that’d be a lie. The tale takes silly, incomprehensible turns near the end, and even the most basic questions are left unanswered, swept under the rug in an anti-climax that strays far from the direction the build-up seemed heading. After going absolutely nowhere for so long, the finale feels absurdly rushed, as if development was abruptly cut short when all the loose ends couldn’t possibly be resolved sensibly.

The confusing story isn’t helped by the characters that populate it, all of which are forgotten about as quickly as they are introduced. A good example of this is Bjorn, a member of the village’s Brotherhood and one of the core characters from the original, who requests your help and then disappears, never to be mentioned again. This issue isn’t isolated to returning faces, with new characters such as Korka, a quirky, puzzle-loving flirt who seems poised to take a starring role before suddenly being sidelined, dismissed on a whim. The encounters you have with the inhabitants of Scoggins are brief but still manage to be tedious, spent mainly repeating the same questions and topics with each new character yet rarely resulting in any useful details.

When you do finally unearth a lead, a new location is added to the quick travel map. You’ll revisit places like the Brotherhood’s clubhouse and the Moose Ear Diner, where the local sheriff spends most of his time, but you’ll find some new ones as well, from Korka’s cosy home to several spots hidden in the gnome-infested forest. Interactions are rather sparse at each stop, typically inhabited by a sole individual, but the constant change of scenery provides at least a sense of story progression, however fleeting it quickly proves. There is some adventure-style interaction with the environment, but it’s very limited, with no inventory to collect and no real clues to investigate. Finding the few areas of interaction couldn’t be easier, as clicking the screen results in any nearby hotspots being highlighted.

As you work your way around the village, you’ll be confronted with a series of puzzles. The challenges are often very bland, and most have very little relevance to the story or even the conversation at hand. One such puzzle has you arranging photos in the order they were taken, which is inexplicably prompted by clicking an empty coffee table in the middle of a shack. There are 35 puzzles in total, some of which are optional, including mathematical equations, completing numbered sequences, sliding obstacles to create a path, and cutting through multiple barriers with a single slice. Most of the puzzles are basic and very common types to begin with, and the problem is compounded by repetition later on. It’d be a lot less annoying if the repeated puzzles scaled in difficulty, providing a greater challenge each time, but this isn’t the case. In fact, the puzzles barely provide difficulty at all; the majority are solvable in seconds for anyone with much puzzle experience.

A few puzzles do require very specific knowledge, so if you’re not familiar with American coins and certain advanced math symbols, you may have trouble on occasion. If anything else is likely to give you problems, it’s the actual instructions. When a puzzle begins, you’re given a brief explanation and set of rules for how to solve it. Unfortunately, these instructions can be worded vaguely, and they appear on a separate screen that you need to continually return to for repeat viewings of multiple rules. The puzzle interface itself feels clunky and unresponsive as well, particularly with any actions that require you to perform drag or rotation movements. Issues like these indicate shortcuts taken for cross-platform development rather than properly optimising the design for each system.

If you do get stuck on a puzzle, you can chew gum (which helps Nelson concentrate) to access a progressive set of three hints. Gum is littered all around town, stuck to the walls and trees waiting for you to pick them up (a little gross and strange). The system works well enough, with subtle first hints avoiding outright spoilers too early, although the requirement feels redundant given the extreme simplicity of most puzzles and the abundance of chewing gum available. Using hints, along with answering incorrectly, will lower your score for each puzzle and affect your overall total, though this doesn’t impact the game in any way. If you do poorly, you can always give them another go later, accessing them from your journal, but this won’t affect your game score.

Though the game stumbles both in story and gameplay, its presentation does salvage it somewhat. Borrowing heavily from the Grickle comics, the creation of cartoonist Graham Annable (who also worked on the game), the art direction is done in a stark style, with thick, bold charcoal outlines. Animations are intentionally crude, almost skipping from one movement to another, somewhat resembling paging through a comic flick book. It’s not a style that will suit all tastes, but it stands out from the crowd. Personally I appreciate the unique direction, and it’s certainly one of the selling points of the series. It’s just a shame to see so many assets reused from the first game, drastically reducing the overall impact.

One of my biggest frustrations stemmed from the slow speech, with subtitles printed at the same pace as the voices. You’d expect mouse-clicking would speed up the text to read at your own speed, but it skips the line altogether. The upside to patiently waiting through full lines of dialogue is the quality of the voice acting, apart from rare exceptions like Korka’s awkward flirtations. Nelson is once again solid and believable as a rather hapless FBI agent out of his element, and the Scoggins residents, particularly the innkeeper and Sheriff Bahg, feature distinct Scandinavian accents suited to the setting.

Adding to the ambience are the periodic whispers of the Hidden People and the tense background music tracks, creating the eerie vibe the Grickle animations strive for. Despite its cartoony appearance, the atmosphere is more dark than comic, building up tension more from implied suggestion than actual frightening events. Discordant tones play as Nelson warily glances around a nighttime forest, and the Hidden People poke their heads out from cover, not overtly threatening but their intentions never clear.

It’s a shame that the great atmosphere is let down by the tone of the story, which ultimately just comes across as entirely unbelievable over the course of the game's few hours of play time. Given the promising trial run of its predecessor, Puzzle Agent 2 had every opportunity to build on those accomplishments and enhance the areas needing improvement, but somehow the recipe for success was lost, or ignored, and what’s left leaves a sour taste of disappointment. Releasing for a budget price doesn’t excuse mediocre puzzle design, heavy repetition and a story with so little coherence. The artwork is unique and the tension sometimes palpable, but that isn’t nearly enough a second time around. It’s hard to understand how Telltale got the formula so wrong this time… maybe it was the gnomes.





Buy it at:

Game Info

Puzzle Agent 2

Platform: iPad, iPhone/iPod Touch, Mac, Mobile (Other), PC, PlayStation 3

Genre: Mystery

Developer: Telltale Games

More Game Info »

Releases
Territory Date Publisher
Download June 30 2011 Telltale Games
Affiliate Links


Screenshots
Showing 6 of 30

Other Related Games

User Score

Average based on 6 ratings

Log in or Register to post ratings.

User Reviews
No user reviews yet. Why not post one!

About the Author
Reece Warrender
Staff Writer

Comments

Shany
Jul 11, 2011

“Using hints, along with answering incorrectly, will lower your score for each puzzle and affect your overall total, though this doesn’t impact the game in any way.”

Actually, I think there’s a bonus puzzle if you finish all puzzles without hints or mistakes.
Also, there are two endings, affected by whether or not you fail the final “puzzle”, but they’re not too different from each other.

Apart from that, I mostly agree with the review, though I rather liked the story. It was nonsensical, but for me that was the point. It was all about lunacy Smile.
However, I agree that It is annoying that they didn’t close all the plot threads.
I am also annoyed that, even after two games, nobody told a single story about the Hidden People. For supposed “fairy tale” creatures there are no tales about them.

Lucien21 Lucien21
Jul 11, 2011

Wow, it’s not very often I disagree with a review on AG, but 2 stars is HARSH.

I don’t think you can really complain about the puzzles not integrating with the story when it is essentially a Layton homage. It’s a puzzle game, it says so in the title, unlike adventures the puzzles are not supposed to be linked to the plot.

I liked the crazy plot and while it isn’t a 5 star game I would have given it at least 3 - 3.5 stars.

thom-22
Jul 11, 2011

Good review. I agree on weak puzzles, confusing story, two stars. But I would raise the same quibble that Lucien21 did about that one remark. No, the puzzles were not integrated with the story but that’s not a requirement for a puzzle game. The integration of puzzles into an environment and story is what distinguishes an adventure game from a puzzle game; Puzzle Agent is clearly the latter and shouldn’t be judged by adventure-game standards. Objecting to the lack of puzzle integration in a puzzle game isn’t much different than complaining about a lack of shooting or combat in an adventure game. Grin

Ascovel Ascovel
Jul 11, 2011

If lack of integration of the puzzles into the environment and story is what transforms an adventure game into a puzzle game, then how could this aspect be ever criticized? But if is it possible to have a puzzle game with this kind of integration and still remain a puzzle game, then why not criticize a puzzle game for lacking in that department?

Jackal Jackal
Jul 11, 2011

Puzzle Agent is most definitely not just a puzzle game. It’s puzzle-heavy, obviously, but its story is absolutely crucial to what makes the experience what it is. And if you’re going to have both story and puzzles play such an important role, you’ve got to at least make an attempt to integrate them together. And Puzzle Agent knows that, because some puzzles are worked in pretty smoothly. But some are just randomly shoehorned in, and that’s the complaint. First game got 3.5 stars with the same issue, mind you, so it’s not like it’s a deal-breaker or anything.

thom-22
Jul 12, 2011

How does story being crucial to the experience have any impact on what genre the gameplay falls into? Why *can’t* you have both story and puzzles without integrating the two? Many games in many genres, including many puzzle-type games, incorporate stories into the player experience, but not all of them integrate story and gameplay in a meaningful way. Many of PA1-2’s puzzles are so blatantly *not* integrated with the story that it’s hard to believe that’s what they were aiming for. (Moreover, none of PA’s puzzles are integrated into the game-world—they’re solved on separate, standalone screens.) Lots of puzzle games are like PA1-2 in this way, and puzzle games are a valid and worthy genre in their own right. It’s not an insult to call something a puzzle game, even one in which the story is clearly intended to be crucial to the experience.

D.C. D.C.
Jul 12, 2011

I didn’t mind Puzzle Agent 2, but it was no where near as great as the first one. I didn’t particularly like the pi and coin puzzles, but they were optional so I can’t really complain. I still love the art direction and style of this series and can’t wait to see what they’re gonna do with Nelson Tethers next.

Jackal Jackal
Jul 12, 2011

“Why *can’t* you have both story and puzzles without integrating the two? Many games in many genres, including many puzzle-type games, incorporate stories into the player experience, but not all of them integrate story and gameplay in a meaningful way.” I could care less what genre label people want to use. I just said there’s way more to the game than just a bunch of puzzles. The story here isn’t just an afterthought between puzzles like it is in some other puzzly games. No one said you can’t have a game with disconnected story and puzzles. Of course you can. Same way you can make a peanut butter and pickle sandwich if you want. Both are perfectly valid and taste good on their own, but if you’re going to mix ingredients that taste good together, you should really combine two things that complement each other, not just co-exist.

fov fov
Jul 12, 2011

The issues isn’t just that the puzzles aren’t integrated, but that they claim to be integrated and often don’t do a good job of it. A lot of them are set up as if the puzzle fits into the story, but in reality it feels slapped on.

Puzzle Agent 2 has very few random puzzles sprinkled around town. The majority of them are direct obstacles stopping you from continuing with the story, which is a bit different than how puzzles are presented in the Layton games. And in this game in particular, since Nelson is supposed to be the FBI’s top puzzle agent, an expectation is set from the beginning that solving puzzles directly relates to cracking the case.

A recent game that does a great job of this is Red Johnson’s Chronicles. It’s full of self-contained puzzles just like a Puzzle Agent or Layton game, and the puzzles are directly related to the investigation. By solving them you learn something new about the case, which is generally not true in Puzzle Agent.

adventor
Jul 17, 2011

This is disappointing. I enjoyed the first puzzle agent, it was pretty fun but was hoping they’d improve upon it. Taking steps backward doesn’t sound too promising.



Post a comment

You need to be logged in to post comments. Not a member? Register now!

Also check out...

Year Walk review

iPhone iPad

Journey review

PS3